i'm sure those who read the sunday times yesterday would have seen the article on sg bloggers conference or wadever. and if you actually bothered paying attention to such silly things (like what i did), you'd have read abt the hunkiest blogger. some guy..who supposedly likes to live dangerously. and st's evidence of tt? he continues his blog despite his teacher wanting him to shut it down 1.5 yrs back due to some offensive remark or comment or wadever. oh yeah. how dangerous indeed. you mean if he didn't listen to his teacher and shut it down, he'll get expelled? or will he die from some curse tt his petty teacher tries to perform upon him? or will his guilt just swallow him up and cause him to commit suicide? so if continuing a blog despite certain narrow-minded idiots makes one lead a dangerous life, or so to quote, then i suppose sarong party girl is one heck of a dare-devil. well, afterall, half d nation's dissing her and insulting her and insisting tt she closes her blog or just comply to their wants, she still continues living in her own way. yeah, and all this big hoo-ha just because of a nation newspaper which insists on reporting on how her pics posted online are offensive. of cux, if half d nation consists of discerning readers and know how to laugh at things,this probably wouldn't happen. but no. half the nation decides tt the pics might lead to some kids getting addicted to pornography. half the nation feels that the pics reveals her decadent lifestyle, and in turn, reflect on how decadent singapore is. yeah. afterall, we decided tt d only reason why the no. of AIDS patients increased was due to the gay party. incidentally, that half of the nation just happens to be those who think that hugging and displaying affection in public is a big no-no. not the correct way to love? tell that to tom cruise and katie holmes. just cox you keep your affections in ur bedroom doesn't mean tt ppl are not spontaneous. moral bigots. go be a hermit and you won't be affected by all these.